Whilst out shooting for the NT at the Kingston Lacy estate at the weekend came across a couple of local fields with the hay bales. First a very wide shot with my 10-22 and then closer with my 40 f2.8
stan
stan
-
-
Re: Hay Bales II
Both have their strengths Stan.
Tom -
Re: Hay Bales II
As Tom says both have different strengths.
But for me the second works better, I think it's the foreground interest.Andy
_____________________________
Canon EOS 5D MarkIV, 11-24mm f4, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 24-105mm f4, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II USM, 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 IS II USM, 100mm Macro, 50mm f1.4, Speedlite 600EX-RT, Manfrotto tripod
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyberdavis/Comment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
Agree with Andy
SueComment
-
-
Re: Hay Bales II
Second one for me too Stan, prefer the viewpoint and composition over the first.
Bill.7D, 400D, EF-S 15-85 f3.5/5.6, EF 100 f2.8 USM macro, Sigma 10-20 f4/5.6, Sigma 70-300 f4/5.6 APO, Sigma 50 f1.4, EF 28-90, EF 90-300, Sigma 150-600C, 430 EXll, Yongnuo 568 EX ll, Yongnuo Triggers, Yongnuo YN14-EX Ring Flash
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/94610707@N05/Comment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
Cheers guys
With this sort of shot, a wide angle lens is not always the best and my 24-105 was at home but luckily I had the 40 f2.8 in the bag
StanComment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
agree the second is stronger - nice work Stan:- Ian
5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)
:- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/Comment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
cheers Ian
StanComment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
Agree with the others Stan - number two for me. I like the way the tree canopy loses height from right to left and the right foreground interest from the largest bale balances it. Good one.Comment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
Thanks for looking Tony
StanComment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
Number two here too. Greater emphasis on the subjects and the sky is stronger as well.
Nigel
You may know me from Another Place....
The new ElSid Photogallery...
Equipment: Far too much to list - including lots of Nikon...Comment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
Yup. Totally agree. Nice shot StanOriginally posted by El Sid View PostNumber two here too. Greater emphasis on the subjects and the sky is stronger as well.Alan.
7D2, 24-105 L / 70-200 F2.8 ii L / 50 F1.8 prime / Sigma 10-20 F4-F5.6
Website www.alanreeve.co.uk
Please take a look https://www.flickr.com/photos/82149274@N07/sets & https://www.facebook.com/reevephotographyComment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
Agree with all the others, second a stronger image. Composition works well.Canon 5D3, 7D2, 60D, Canon 70-200L f2.8 IS II, Canon 300 f4L IS, Canon 16-35 f4 L, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Canon 1.4 MkIII extender, Sigma AF 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary, Tamron SP AF 70-300 F/4-5.6 Di VC USD, Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 IS
https://www.flickr.com/photos/16830751@N03/Comment
-
Re: Hay Bales II
thanks guys
stanComment
Comment