Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Spooky cinema

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Spooky cinema

    What do you mean the verticals are out a bit :)

    I played around with this as I wanted to make it have a spooky dark feeling so used a radial around the light and desaturated the rest - think it works

    Spooky Cinema by Ian Theobald, on Flickr
    :- Ian

    5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)

    :- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/

    #2
    Re: Spooky cinema

    Shows a master at work. Excellent image, which is certainly out of my comfort zone.
    Canon 6D; Canon 760D;Canon G15;Canon 40mm f2.8(Pancake);Canon 50mm f1.8(ii); Canon 17mm-40mm f4L;Canon EF-S 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 IS STM;Canon EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 STM lens;Canon 24mm-105mmf4L IS;Canon 70-300mm f4-f5.6 L IS USM;Kenko 1.4x HD TC;Canon 430EX ii flash;Giottos tripod;Manfretto monopod;Cokin P filters + bits and pieces!

    www.flickr.com/photos/nathaniel3390

    North Wales where music and the sea give a great concert!

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Spooky cinema

      :) thanks
      :- Ian

      5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)

      :- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Spooky cinema

        The master done well. Excellent Ian.
        Derek

        EOS R, RF 24-105mm L f4, EF 16-35mm L f4, EF 70-200mm f4 L IS II USM

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Spooky cinema

          Love it! Just the place to watch an old Vincent Price film.
          Russell
          Canon 7D MkII, 550D EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro, 300mm f/4L IS USM, Extender EF 1.4x III, Speedlite 600 EX-RT Speedlite 320EX
          http://www.flickr.com/photos/photorussell

          Comment


            #6
            Re: Spooky cinema

            Getting your mojo back Ian

            Tom

            Comment


              #7
              Re: Spooky cinema

              spot on processing Ian
              Stan
              Stan - LRPS, CPAGB, BPE2*

              http://neptuno-photography.foliopic.com/
              flickr

              Comment


                #8
                Re: Spooky cinema

                Not the most attractive building you've photographed so the processing works well with it

                Cheers,
                John

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: Spooky cinema

                  Wasn't sure about this but you've added great processing to make it memorable, it's grown on me now.
                  Canon EOS R5, R6 plus the usual suspects ......

                  https://www.flickr.com/photos/bo_fo_to

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: Spooky cinema

                    cheers all - I'm trying to get access inside, could be very interesting
                    :- Ian

                    5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)

                    :- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Re: Spooky cinema

                      Another well worked image Ian.
                      Andrew

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Re: Spooky cinema

                        thanks Andrew
                        :- Ian

                        5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)

                        :- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Re: Spooky cinema

                          I think this photograph demonstrates the difference between you and most others on the forum, it definitely shows the difference between you and me. As I see it there were three basic stages in getting the outcome.

                          1) i'll come back to.
                          2) Taking the original shot, which isn't particularly difficult and I'm sure we could have all taken it.
                          3) The processing, once again not too difficult, I think most of us could apply a radial filter and desaturate outside then darken sky etc.

                          Back to 1
                          1) Having the artistic imagination to think of the particular shot you wanted. i think that's the big difference. I can take a pic of a kingfisher or other bird on a post, sometimes catch a bird in flight, track a fast moving car or motorcycle. If you stick me in front of a nice landscape, I can take a reasonable shot but I and most others, lack the imagination to do some thing a bit different like this....that's the big difference between us.

                          I can't say this is my favourite shot of yours but it does show the imagination.

                          John

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Re: Spooky cinema

                            A very imposing shot Ian which I like
                            Alan.

                            7D2, 24-105 L / 70-200 F2.8 ii L / 50 F1.8 prime / Sigma 10-20 F4-F5.6

                            Website www.alanreeve.co.uk

                            Please take a look https://www.flickr.com/photos/82149274@N07/sets & https://www.facebook.com/reevephotography

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Re: Spooky cinema

                              Originally posted by Swanny48 View Post
                              I think this photograph demonstrates the difference between you and most others on the forum, it definitely shows the difference between you and me. As I see it there were three basic stages in getting the outcome.

                              1) i'll come back to.
                              2) Taking the original shot, which isn't particularly difficult and I'm sure we could have all taken it.
                              3) The processing, once again not too difficult, I think most of us could apply a radial filter and desaturate outside then darken sky etc.

                              Back to 1
                              1) Having the artistic imagination to think of the particular shot you wanted. i think that's the big difference. I can take a pic of a kingfisher or other bird on a post, sometimes catch a bird in flight, track a fast moving car or motorcycle. If you stick me in front of a nice landscape, I can take a reasonable shot but I and most others, lack the imagination to do some thing a bit different like this....that's the big difference between us.

                              I can't say this is my favourite shot of yours but it does show the imagination.

                              John
                              thanks for your views John - I do enjoy looking at locations and trying to work out how and what I can do to make the image more interesting, either bracketing or just playing around in one of the many editors I have access to, sometimes it works, sometime I fall flat, but I like to try

                              Originally posted by Parsen66 View Post
                              A very imposing shot Ian which I like
                              thanks Alan
                              :- Ian

                              5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)

                              :- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X