Re: Adobe Camera Raw versus DPP
In a sense, you are right. But the benefit of those attributes is that it is very quick.
I now only spend minutes going through my raw files to tweek them to the very best RAW files I can achieve, before just importing the very best shots into Photoshop for some final polish.
Having a RAW converter that does everything is a bit like having a combi printer that prints, scans, sends faxes, makes the tea, or maybe a 10mm - 300mm lens. All very convenient in their own way, but not as good as the real thing.
I'm not a great fan of DPP. I find it very clunky and somewhat basic compared to ACR
I now only spend minutes going through my raw files to tweek them to the very best RAW files I can achieve, before just importing the very best shots into Photoshop for some final polish.
Having a RAW converter that does everything is a bit like having a combi printer that prints, scans, sends faxes, makes the tea, or maybe a 10mm - 300mm lens. All very convenient in their own way, but not as good as the real thing.
Comment