-
Di ~ Trying to take "the" photograph.
Di's Flickr -
Re: 17-40 v 24-105 width comparison
Inflatable sheep would be more in keeping with the original scene I posted. Position a couple of yards beyond the end of my shadow. Thus you have the lead in (my shadow) foreground interest the blow up sheep 😜😜😳Peter
Feel free to browse my
Website : www.peterstockton-photography.co.uk
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/the_original_st/Comment
-
Re: 17-40 v 24-105 width comparison
Pop over the other side of the Pennines - inflatable sheep are a big seller there, for those who can't get the real thing. ;)Originally posted by ST-EOS View PostPlease don't ask about my kit, it's embarrassing!
Comment
- CHAT TO OTHER PHOTOGRAPHERS ON THE FRIENDLY FORUM
In these troubled times it is good to talk. If you want to stay in touch with other EOS photographers, this forum is here to help. In addition to the many photo categories, 'The New EOS Pub' is a safe space to post and read messages about anything (but please steer clear of religion and politics). The forum is free. Register now if you are not already a member.
If you are new to forums, details about how to post and other useful information can be found in the FAQ section
A LITTLE LIGHT READING
If you want to learn more about photography while isolated at home, click https://www.eos-magazine.com/Magazine/subscribe.html
This will show how you can access digital editions of every copy of EOS magazine back to 2006 - nearly 60 issues!
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- The forum software has been updated, if you see any javascript errors, the suggestion from vBulletin is to clear your browser cache and try again.
Comment