Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Watch Tower

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Watch Tower

    wtsq.jpg

    #2
    Re: Watch Tower

    I like that! Great processing with an IR feel to it of an interesting subject. I may have been inclined to crop the bottom from where the diagonal shadow comes in from the left and uploaded via Flickr to avoid the softness of direct uploads and give sight of the EXIF data. But still very nice

    Cheers,
    John

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Watch Tower

      agree with John
      :- Ian

      5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)

      :- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Watch Tower

        Agree also with John
        Alan.

        7D2, 24-105 L / 70-200 F2.8 ii L / 50 F1.8 prime / Sigma 10-20 F4-F5.6

        Website www.alanreeve.co.uk

        Please take a look https://www.flickr.com/photos/82149274@N07/sets & https://www.facebook.com/reevephotography

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Watch Tower

          Also agree with John

          Tom

          Comment


            #6
            Re: Watch Tower

            thanks for the comments

            Comment


              #7
              Re: Watch Tower

              Hmmmm to me the second version looks exactly the same???
              Alan.

              7D2, 24-105 L / 70-200 F2.8 ii L / 50 F1.8 prime / Sigma 10-20 F4-F5.6

              Website www.alanreeve.co.uk

              Please take a look https://www.flickr.com/photos/82149274@N07/sets & https://www.facebook.com/reevephotography

              Comment


                #8
                Re: Watch Tower

                Originally posted by Parsen66 View Post
                Hmmmm to me the second version looks exactly the same???
                The first picture was uploaded from my computer and the second is linked to tinypic. I thought the second would be sharper.

                Comment

                Working...
                X