Ok I've taken the plunge and bought a mac just need to now what the best photo editing software is.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MacBook software
Collapse
X
-
MacBook software
EOS 60d, EF50mm 1.8, EF-S18-55mm 3.5-5.6, EF 28-90mm 4-5.6, EF-S 55-250mm 4-5.6 IS, Sigma 10-20mm 3.5 EX DC HSM
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jongoodger/Tags: None
-
Re: MacBook software
macphun without a shed of doubt:- Ian
5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)
:- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/
-
Alan.
7D2, 24-105 L / 70-200 F2.8 ii L / 50 F1.8 prime / Sigma 10-20 F4-F5.6
Website www.alanreeve.co.uk
Please take a look https://www.flickr.com/photos/82149274@N07/sets & https://www.facebook.com/reevephotography
Comment
-
Re: MacBook software
I'll have a look at it once my new toy turns up.
Only upgrading to a Mac as my laptop keeps losing driver for camera and take over 45min to transfer photos then they didn't saveEOS 60d, EF50mm 1.8, EF-S18-55mm 3.5-5.6, EF 28-90mm 4-5.6, EF-S 55-250mm 4-5.6 IS, Sigma 10-20mm 3.5 EX DC HSM
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jongoodger/
Comment
-
Re: MacBook software
well I've downloaded the trail it looks good so far going be a big learning curve comparded to windows getting used to keyboard short cuts and layout.
is it worth looking at Lightroom are not?EOS 60d, EF50mm 1.8, EF-S18-55mm 3.5-5.6, EF 28-90mm 4-5.6, EF-S 55-250mm 4-5.6 IS, Sigma 10-20mm 3.5 EX DC HSM
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jongoodger/
Comment
-
Re: MacBook software
Originally posted by ricewind View Post
is it worth looking at Lightroom are not?:- Ian
5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)
:- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/
Comment
-
Re: MacBook software
Originally posted by ricewind View Postwell I've downloaded the trail it looks good so far going be a big learning curve comparded to windows getting used to keyboard short cuts and layout.
Is it worth looking at Lightroom are not?
The other thing Luminar doesn't have is asset management. To your second question, LR would give you that - the cataloguing etc. - and you can use Luminar as a plugin within LR so that would give you the best of both worlds. The only downside is that LR is a bit of a memory hog itself so you may run into that old memory problem again. Memory usage by LR and general slowness was why I stopped using it myself.
I still bought Luminar in spite of these limitations - the asset management bit is promised and I hope they fix the memory issue sometime soon - but don't use it. It's a really good looking and powerful product, they really have got a lot right with it.
As of now, I'm using Adobe Bridge, PhotoShop CS6 and the Nik Plugins which gives me a lot of the capabilities of Luminar (It's almost as if Macphun learned from the approach the writers of Nik took) but is a lot less integrated.
HTH.EOS 7D mk II, Sigma 150-660C, Canon 17-85 EF-S, Tamron 10-24 and a wife who shares my obsession.
Comment
Comment