Having tried CSCs from Olympus and Fuji I eventually came back to Canon....now using a 5D3 and 100D.
it occurs to me that the 100D is very capable and possible more capable than the CSCs I've tried.
....and the XXXXD and XXXD are significantly cheaper than the Fuji XT2 (dslr like CSC), XPro2 (rangefinder like CSC) or Olympus EM-5 (dslr like CSC) or PEN (compact CSC).
My conclusion is its just a style choice.....interestingly CSCs are often compared with top end DSLRs....with which they equate in price terms but not with lower end DSLRs with which they compare in performance terms.
The marketeers are having a great time here!
Paradoxically I've read from contributors on here being tempted away from top end DSLRs to CSCs....and I suspect they'd not be tempted away to lower end DSLRs....(just as I once was).
Just my thoughts.....any opinions?
it occurs to me that the 100D is very capable and possible more capable than the CSCs I've tried.
....and the XXXXD and XXXD are significantly cheaper than the Fuji XT2 (dslr like CSC), XPro2 (rangefinder like CSC) or Olympus EM-5 (dslr like CSC) or PEN (compact CSC).
My conclusion is its just a style choice.....interestingly CSCs are often compared with top end DSLRs....with which they equate in price terms but not with lower end DSLRs with which they compare in performance terms.
The marketeers are having a great time here!
Paradoxically I've read from contributors on here being tempted away from top end DSLRs to CSCs....and I suspect they'd not be tempted away to lower end DSLRs....(just as I once was).
Just my thoughts.....any opinions?
Comment