Laurel Falls

[tesarver]

Went up to the Laurel Falls near the Delaware Watergap in New Jersey. I took two cameras with me. EOS M3 w/Tamron 10-24mm and the 6DMKII w/ EF 24-105mm.

All images were Raw Images imported in LR and some post processing there

This is the Lower Laurel Falls:

6DMKII @ 24mm f/18, ISO 100 @ 13 sec
Lower Laurel Falls by tesarver, on Flickr

EOS M3 @ 13mm f/16 ISO 100 @ 5 sec
Lower Laurel Falls by tesarver, on Flickr

This is the Upper Falls:

EOS M3 @ 19mm f/16 ISO 100 @ 10 sec
Upper Laurel Falls by tesarver, on Flickr

6DMKII @ 35mm f/18 ISO 100 @ 8 sec
Upper Laurel Falls by tesarver, on Flickr

Comments Welcomed

Tom

[pelliott1954]

Re: Laurel Falls

Nice set Tom, I think you have just the right amount of milky water effect

Regards Paul

[Tony Hawkins]

Re: Laurel Falls

Nice set Tom. Although I'll be biased I do prefer the 6D II images

[enneo]

Re: Laurel Falls

Very nice captures Tom.

[Stan]

Re: Laurel Falls

milk is about right

Loads of falls in your locality

Stan

[colin C]

Re: Laurel Falls

Nice set Tom.

I think I prefer the 6D MKII versions. Assuming they have been processed the same, the colouring is just a tad too vivid on the M3 versions.

[tesarver]

Re: Laurel Falls

Thanks Paul, Tony, Derek, Stan & Colin for stopping by. Colin that are processed the same in LR as I wanted to see the differences between cameras and Lens. Did this before we travel in October, as my plan it to bring the M5 with the Tamron 18-400 attached and the M3 with the 10-24 attached and then 1 other lens the EF-M 18-55mm.

[EOS_User]

Re: Laurel Falls

Hi Tom; an interesting exercise... The M3 seems to be picking up a significant blue bias, specially on the rocks, and is maybe a little richer in the reds, both of which can be 'tamed' in LR or PS... IQ wise, there doesn't appear to be much in it - but the full size may show better. Enjoy your travels - I'll look forward to seeing some results

[ctrollen]

Re: Laurel Falls

Nice shots, Tom. The "milky" water is very well done.

It's difficult to know what is better without knowing what you saw. For instance, in the second pair of shots, I prefer the black rocks from the M3 images over the muddy brown colours of the 6D2, although overall I think the 6D2 just has it. And whichever one is "right" is dependent wholly on what you saw, otherwise it's just down to sorting them in PP.