These are worth reading, whether you agree or not :
-
EOS 6D, 6D Mk II, 80D, 70D, 100D, 200D, M50, M100. Canon 10-18, 18 - 55, 55 - 250 IS STM lenses, Canon 16 - 35 mm F4L, 35 mm EF-S macro, 50 mm F1.8 STM, 60 mm EF-S macro, MPE-65 macro, 85 mm F1.8, 200 mm F2.8 L II, M 15 - 45 mm, M 22mm F2, M 32mm F1.4. Sigma 24 - 35 F2 Art, 135 mm F1.8 Art, 17 - 50 F2.8 DC, 105 mm OS macro, 100 - 400 C, 150 - 600 C. -
Re: Couple of comments to make you think - perhaps.
Makes me think they seem to be rather more interested in the technology than the end result...
I also feel there's an element of their having pitched their expectations a bit high. I was further amused by the comments on the DR of the 5Ds models being lower than the regular version - like everything in the real world it's a matter of balance and compromise, if you double the pixel count in the same area the pixels will be much smaller and their maximum capacity is reduced which inevitably has a knock on effect on DR and noise control.
I also think when comparing 'innovation' to Nikon and Sony they ought to remember that Nikon have been some way behind for quite a long time and much of the innovation is just catching up with where Canon are now. Sony must inevitably look innovative with the Alpha 7 since no other maker has a full frame CSC while Nikon don't even have a decent small format one...
I do agree that Canon's approach to CSC's has been a bit lacklustre and they still have some way to go but the latest M models are much more on track.Nigel
You may know me from Another Place....
The new ElSid Photogallery...
Equipment: Far too much to list - including lots of Nikon...
Comment