There's an interesting new video (I usually hate videos, prefer to read but ……………..) on FStoppers titled:
"Surprising Comparison Results Between Canon R, Nikon Z7, and Sony a7R III"
I would post a link here, but when I do that the site thinks its spam and blocks me, but Fstoppers is easy to find.
It's good news for those here (the great majority, I suspect) who are only interested in the Canon R (or successors) as a stills camera and have no interest in video (especially 4k).
After the regular negative reviews in regard to dynamic range and ISO performance of Canon, this is a definite breath of fresh air. I think the word "Surprising" in the title doesn't apply to those of us who have been using Canon for years, we know that we get good solid all round performance whatever the "fanboys" of other makes say.
"Surprising Comparison Results Between Canon R, Nikon Z7, and Sony a7R III"
I would post a link here, but when I do that the site thinks its spam and blocks me, but Fstoppers is easy to find.
It's good news for those here (the great majority, I suspect) who are only interested in the Canon R (or successors) as a stills camera and have no interest in video (especially 4k).
After the regular negative reviews in regard to dynamic range and ISO performance of Canon, this is a definite breath of fresh air. I think the word "Surprising" in the title doesn't apply to those of us who have been using Canon for years, we know that we get good solid all round performance whatever the "fanboys" of other makes say.
Comment