EOS magazine advert The Photography Show
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Eyes

  1. #1
    Member SpringfieldPhoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    South Wales

    Default Eyes

    Took these for a bet
    Attached Images Attached Images

    2 5D Mk IVs, EOS 3, Canon 20mm f2.8, Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art, Sigma 50mm f1.4 Art, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art, Canon 85mm f1.4, Tamron 24-70 f2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8 and Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro.


  2. #2
    Member colin C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009

    Default Re: Eyes

    Not easy Alan, especially with a depth of field of next to nothing.

    I rather like the colour popping to attract attention to where you want it, but I think it works better on the second image. For some strange reason, instead of a pupil on the first image, it looks like a hole. Perhaps because she is looking further away from the camera. Either way, original well executed work.

  3. #3
    Member* Coolcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Clacton On Sea Essex and Acle Norfolk Broads

    Default Re: Eyes

    Very nice detail...........Did you win the bet?


    Eos 1D Mk4, EF 24-105L F4, EF 16-35L F4, EF 70-200L F2.8 mk2, EF 100L F2.8 macro, 1.4 and 2.0 mk3 converters, 600EX-RT and 430EX Speedlites, Tamrac expedition 6 back back and Manfrotto tripod and monopod

  4. #4

    Default Re: Eyes

    I agree with Colin...the direction of the light source in the first one casts a lot of shadow on the white of the eye whereas the light is more evenly distributed on the second.
    Canon EOS 5D MKIV, 17-40 f4L, 24-105 f4L, 24mm f1.4L II, 50mm f1.2L, 100mm f2.8L macro, 200mm f2.8L II
    Canon EOS 200D
    EF-S 10-18mm STM, EF-S 18-55mm STM, EF-S18-55mm IS II, EF-S 55-250mm IS STM, EF-S 24mm f2.8 STM, EF-S 35mm Macro STM, EF 50mm f1.8 STM, 85mm f1.8 USM



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts