The Tube at 150 years old

[rcarca]

Re: The Tube at 150 years old

1 would work if they were the old tube trains but as they are not then its no 2

Stan

It was a poor quality joke!!! Sorry! But thanks for looking and Peter as well.

Richard

[ST-EOS]

Re: The Tube at 150 years old

I have to go for number 2 as well

[rcarca]

Re: The Tube at 150 years old

I saw somewhere where they used an old steam train on the underground in celebration of the 150 years.
It's been a long while since I've been to London but I'm guessing the smells are the same on the underground.

It doesn't seem to change much!!!

[Hereford_EOS]

Re: The Tube at 150 years old

I saw somewhere where they used an old steam train on the underground in celebration of the 150 years.
It's been a long while since I've been to London but I'm guessing the smells are the same on the underground.

[Stan]

Re: The Tube at 150 years old

1 would work if they were the old tube trains but as they are not then its no 2

Stan

[chodeva]

Re: The Tube at 150 years old

#1

[MX5]

Re: The Tube at 150 years old

... grouchy, irritable, scratchy, and inflexible...

... and that's just the passengers . It was nice to see they are running steam trains again (albeit just a few specials).

Not the easiest place to take photographs ... no preference from the two.

[tesarver]

The Tube at 150 years old

Of the 2, the 2nd image for me.

Tom

[rcarca]

It doesn't look a day over 150, nor does it act a day younger... grouchy, irritable, scratchy, and inflexible... And apparently we Londoners spend over 5 days a year down the Tube...


Is there any difference??? by RCARCARCA, on Flickr


The Tube Today at 150 years old by RCARCARCA, on Flickr

EXIF: the usual 5Diii, 24-105mm at 28mm, 1/50sec, f5.0, ISO5000

Which do you prefer???

Richard