Having owned a 1Ds II, for 6 years or so, which probably didn't have the most advanced metering system - but which proved very reliable - I was hoping for great things from the metering system in my new 5D III.
But I have been a bit disappointed so far. As I undertand it, the metering is tied (or related to) the AF points used to focus the image. This is giving me some exposure issues, especially in high contrast situations. If I focus on an area of shade, then the rest of the image is "burning out", and focusing on bright areas is causing general under-exposure.
I have also noticed that my skies are burning out a lot too, if the AF point is on land, and the reverse is true (under-exposure of foreground if the foucs point is on the sy).
What is puzzling me most is: surely matching the exposure to te AF point is not that different from what the spot meter would be doing, and if so, what's the point of the "evaluative" setting? I get the feeling that the very sophisticated metering system in the camera is not being utlised fully if tied to the AF.
Does anyone know how to overcome this issue. is there an AF setting that may give a better generalised exposure? Should I use the Auto Lighting Optimizer for better overall reults (I turned it off). If so, what is the best setting for it.
All suggestions are welcome, as I'm now becoming slightly concerned that I did not use my money wisely on this camera.
I look forward to changing that viewpoint.
Stephen
But I have been a bit disappointed so far. As I undertand it, the metering is tied (or related to) the AF points used to focus the image. This is giving me some exposure issues, especially in high contrast situations. If I focus on an area of shade, then the rest of the image is "burning out", and focusing on bright areas is causing general under-exposure.
I have also noticed that my skies are burning out a lot too, if the AF point is on land, and the reverse is true (under-exposure of foreground if the foucs point is on the sy).
What is puzzling me most is: surely matching the exposure to te AF point is not that different from what the spot meter would be doing, and if so, what's the point of the "evaluative" setting? I get the feeling that the very sophisticated metering system in the camera is not being utlised fully if tied to the AF.
Does anyone know how to overcome this issue. is there an AF setting that may give a better generalised exposure? Should I use the Auto Lighting Optimizer for better overall reults (I turned it off). If so, what is the best setting for it.
All suggestions are welcome, as I'm now becoming slightly concerned that I did not use my money wisely on this camera.
I look forward to changing that viewpoint.
Stephen
Comment