Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Body or lens

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Body or lens

    I have the chance to upgrade my presant 400d to a 50d (or the new one which should be out soon) or go for a larger lens ie Sigma 50-500.Now before you all start telling me its down to the pics you take I love to take pics of things that seem to be to far away(aircraft,boats etc)so the 500 would be great.So basiclly its down to a better body or bigger lens whats you views?
    My friends call me Woody

    #2
    Re: Body or lens

    On the premise that bodies become obsolete and lenses don't, I'd say the wise money would be spent on glass.
    Dave

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Body or lens

      I agree. Lenses keep their investment and Sigma's long galss is very good value for money and good optically.
      www.garywhite-photography.com
      Gary White, MPhil
      Travel Photographer

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Body or lens

        IMHO if you're happy with the body and don't have any pressing reasons to change (like preferring the physically larger body of the 50D) then I would say go for glass as that's what'll make a difference to the shots you can take.

        PhotoPlus tested a number of large zooms in this months issue, and it was the Sigma 150-500 that won. (The 50-500 was also in the test group.)

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Body or lens

          If you do go for a body, I would opt for the 40D ahead of the 50D anyway. But agree with others re. glass

          Martin

          Comment


            #6
            Re: Body or lens

            My vote would be for glass as well...

            You don't say what lens kit you already have. The Sigma 50-500 is impressive; but if you are already covered at the shorter end, you might want to consider the Sigma 150-500. (Or even the 120-400). They're cheaper, and lighter, and both also have Image Stabilisation. The 50-500 doesn't...

            NOTE also that all the x-500's are slow at the long end with a max aperture of f/6.3! The 120-400 is f/5.6 at 400mm.
            I actively encourage constructive comment & critique of any image I post!
            Feel free to edit & re-post as you see fit - but please - tell me what you have done to 'improve' the shot!

            Comment


              #7
              Re: Body or lens

              Glass all the way.
              Eric

              5D2 & BG-E6 / 5D & BG-E4 / Eos 300 & PB-200 / Eos 650 / Canon G9
              17-35mm f2.8 L / Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 L / 24-70mm f2.8 L / Canon 28-200mm / 50mm f1.4 / 70-200mm f2.8 L IS / 180mm f3.5 L

              Comment


                #8
                Re: Body or lens

                Glass - easy isn't it!
                http://chrisbirding.blogspot.com/

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: Body or lens

                  Canon-fodder I have at the moment Canon 18-55mm(kit lens),Sigma 24-70mm,Sigma 70-300mm and a Kenco x2 converter.

                  Thanks for all your input.
                  My friends call me Woody

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: Body or lens

                    I have just got the Sigma 150-500 and took it motor racing on the weekend. Dreadful weather but the lens coped well. impressed with the 4 stops of IS.
                    Go for the glass

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Re: Body or lens

                      Looks like glass wins!
                      www.garywhite-photography.com
                      Gary White, MPhil
                      Travel Photographer

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Re: Body or lens

                        all the way
                        Craig

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X