I’m sure I am not the only one? But is there anyone else that doesn’t give two hoots about a cameras video specs/performance?
I have used my EOS camera may be once or twice to record video in nearly 10 years. Yet I have take thousands of still images.
I get the impression (rightly or wrongly?) that the price of new mirrorless cameras seems to be increasing possibly due to satisfying the bigger and better video performance?
Given I am not interested in the video performance I would very much like a camera for photography, yet most reviews hardly mention that angle, they all concentrate on the video performance and codecs and frames per second at 4k etc.
I find it depressing to be forced down the route of having to use an electronic viewfinder when I’ve been quite happy looking through an optical one for many decades… yes I’m an old geezer who started at a young age….
Thanks and regards
Steve
I have used my EOS camera may be once or twice to record video in nearly 10 years. Yet I have take thousands of still images.
I get the impression (rightly or wrongly?) that the price of new mirrorless cameras seems to be increasing possibly due to satisfying the bigger and better video performance?
Given I am not interested in the video performance I would very much like a camera for photography, yet most reviews hardly mention that angle, they all concentrate on the video performance and codecs and frames per second at 4k etc.
I find it depressing to be forced down the route of having to use an electronic viewfinder when I’ve been quite happy looking through an optical one for many decades… yes I’m an old geezer who started at a young age….
Thanks and regards
Steve
Comment