Hello All
Just joined the forums having bought my 7D recently moving from 4/3 to DSLR. Really enjoying it.
I like, and want to move further into, taking action sport shots, mainly mountain biking. Really looking forward to October when we're flying out to Red Bull Rampage in Utah. With this in mind here is my question, and I'm hoping you can all help...
I'm looking for a tele-zoom lens as for the sort of shots I'm looking to take the action will not just be tracking across the viewfinder, but moving towards and away from me too, so not looking for a prime at this time...
I've read great reviews on the 70-200 f4 L (non-IS) and based on the shutter speeds I'm using and most of the action is outside in bright sunshine I'm not looking at the IS model.
However, I am looking for a bit more reach so have been reading up on the complicated extender topic.... It appears the rule, no-matter whose extender, is that a 1.4x will drop a 70-200 f4 down to f5.6 and a 2.0x will drop it to f8.
Now we hit the possible problem... I understand from what i've read that Canon have limited the 7D body (amongst others) so that it won't AF at anything past f5.6. Whilst I can go manual for some of the time, occasionally you can't predict what line or trick the freestylers are going to take, so AF can be very handy.
1. Whilst Canon 2x won't AF with the 70-200 f4, will anyone else's extender allow AF, or is this a body restriction?
2. For an extra £500, it it worth stretching to the 70-200 f2.8 L? Although quite an expense more, I presume the f2.8 would mean I retained AF when using with the Canon 2x extender?
If I could get your opinions on this it would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks,
Scott
Just joined the forums having bought my 7D recently moving from 4/3 to DSLR. Really enjoying it.
I like, and want to move further into, taking action sport shots, mainly mountain biking. Really looking forward to October when we're flying out to Red Bull Rampage in Utah. With this in mind here is my question, and I'm hoping you can all help...
I'm looking for a tele-zoom lens as for the sort of shots I'm looking to take the action will not just be tracking across the viewfinder, but moving towards and away from me too, so not looking for a prime at this time...
I've read great reviews on the 70-200 f4 L (non-IS) and based on the shutter speeds I'm using and most of the action is outside in bright sunshine I'm not looking at the IS model.
However, I am looking for a bit more reach so have been reading up on the complicated extender topic.... It appears the rule, no-matter whose extender, is that a 1.4x will drop a 70-200 f4 down to f5.6 and a 2.0x will drop it to f8.
Now we hit the possible problem... I understand from what i've read that Canon have limited the 7D body (amongst others) so that it won't AF at anything past f5.6. Whilst I can go manual for some of the time, occasionally you can't predict what line or trick the freestylers are going to take, so AF can be very handy.
1. Whilst Canon 2x won't AF with the 70-200 f4, will anyone else's extender allow AF, or is this a body restriction?
2. For an extra £500, it it worth stretching to the 70-200 f2.8 L? Although quite an expense more, I presume the f2.8 would mean I retained AF when using with the Canon 2x extender?
If I could get your opinions on this it would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks,
Scott
Comment