I picked up one of these at the Taunton branch of LCE today and have been really fortunate with the light so have managed to get some test shots and form some opinions. A couple of points first though. First, it's heavy. Really heavy compared to the 400L. So much so that I can't imagine how Jeff and Stan manage their Sport models without a forklift truck. Second, it has limitations. This lens is no silver bullet. Yes you get 600mm at the long end but you still need to fill as much of the frame as you can. Massive crops will expose the lens, as it will with any long lens.
So, some samples:
A female sparrow. This is easily in the same league as the shots I get from the 400L:
Bird in a wire by andymulhearn, on Flickr
The speed of the AF places it in the same league as the 400L too:
Gull by andymulhearn, on Flickr
Gull by andymulhearn, on Flickr
Shooting into the light works too:
Blue tit by andymulhearn, on Flickr
And if you shoot at a bit less than 600mm, then the quality is really rather good. Not that 600mm is bad, just that, well, it gets a bit better :
Cormorant by andymulhearn, on Flickr
Oh, it also works if you stick the mk II Canon 1.4 TC into the mix. No shots as yet but AF works with a recorded f9.0 and that makes it an effective 1344mm lens. Yum, yum.
So, some samples:
A female sparrow. This is easily in the same league as the shots I get from the 400L:
Bird in a wire by andymulhearn, on Flickr
The speed of the AF places it in the same league as the 400L too:
Gull by andymulhearn, on Flickr
Gull by andymulhearn, on Flickr
Shooting into the light works too:
Blue tit by andymulhearn, on Flickr
And if you shoot at a bit less than 600mm, then the quality is really rather good. Not that 600mm is bad, just that, well, it gets a bit better :
Cormorant by andymulhearn, on Flickr
Oh, it also works if you stick the mk II Canon 1.4 TC into the mix. No shots as yet but AF works with a recorded f9.0 and that makes it an effective 1344mm lens. Yum, yum.
Comment