As i have recently upgraded my camera i am starting to notice that my Sigma 18-200mm OS lens suffers at 200mm with sharpness issues... with images viewed at full resolution.
I was wondering as i have a 70-300 mm USM IS F/4-5.6 and that has provided some amazing pictures (for my skill level) how much better can the Canon 70-300 IS L series lens be than the one i have for double the price??
I mean dont get me wrong the Canon 70-300 mm USM IS F/4-5.6 i have is a amazing lens and at £500 new it was not an impulse buy but i do find my self wondering why is the L series version so much more?? surly it cant be that much better can it??
So i thought about renting one.. among others as opposed to buying them but has anyone else actually used one of the rental sites??
thanks
Martin
I was wondering as i have a 70-300 mm USM IS F/4-5.6 and that has provided some amazing pictures (for my skill level) how much better can the Canon 70-300 IS L series lens be than the one i have for double the price??
I mean dont get me wrong the Canon 70-300 mm USM IS F/4-5.6 i have is a amazing lens and at £500 new it was not an impulse buy but i do find my self wondering why is the L series version so much more?? surly it cant be that much better can it??
So i thought about renting one.. among others as opposed to buying them but has anyone else actually used one of the rental sites??
thanks
Martin
Comment