Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

[Nathaniel]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

your also not alone as my missus found my "for my eyes only list" over christmas ,she was not a happy bunny and i have been doing jobs round the house for the last week :-0([/QUOTE]

Thats called as "domestic community service" for being a naughty boy!

[djguk47]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

You should have told her ,Treff ,in advance before she found out ,and then you would not have let loose a "wild animal"!

Sometimes, just sometimes, it is better to be a live chicken than a dead duck...

[Tigger]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

Sometimes, just sometimes, it is better to be a live chicken than a dead duck...

LOL.. agree, pass the cheese

[AndyMulhearn]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

I heard a story a while back about a wife going through her husbands shots at during a wedding reception and finding that he'd taken a load of "cleavage" shots during the wedding and early part of the reception. Apparently a piece of L glass was found lying in the car park the following morning with a rather large bend in it.

[Hereford_EOS]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

What is actually "Wild and Free" ??

Are the ducks, geese, swans etc.. at a RSPB or WWT "wild and free" as these sites are often "man-made" to attract these birds and many are actually ringed ?
Is the Red Kite photographed at Gigrin Farm classed as "wild and free" or is it classed as "wild and free" because I took a photograph of the exact same bird 5 miles away on it's way to/from the feeding station?
Is that Red Squirrel on Brownsea Island classed as "wild and free"? Surely because it is on an "island" it is captive.

Are lions, elephants, zebra that are on a 1million hectare reserve actually "wild and free" as many reserves are enclosed by a fence, that fence theoretically makes them captive.

Do we actually mean:-
In there natural environment?

So "yes" a sub-section titled "In their natural environment" would be interesting and I would definitely look in.

[planetc]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

Would this Belgian bun be classed as captive?

[Tigger]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

I've seen some sad captive animals in the past but that Belgian bun takes the biscuit

[planetc]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

I've seen some sad captive animals in the past but that Belgian bun takes the biscuit

Don't get me started on biscuits ;-)

[Parsen66]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

The bun is nice but, cor, look at that apple.

[2Beers]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

is the apple classed as free range in that it has space to roll around in the tray

[Tigger]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

is the apple classed as free range in that it has space to roll around in the tray

it would be free range if the apple had double the space to freely move around - Had Paul eaten the cake you could have got away with that

[Hereford_EOS]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

Would this Belgian bun be classed as captive?

That really is the icing on the cake as far as this debate goes.

[Tigger]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

[Nathaniel]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

I don't think I am THICK but I don't see the funny part in the recent posts concerning a serious debate, which would surely improve the thread. Perhaps I should suggest a "Jokes" thread to encourage members to post their good jokes there.

[Hereford_EOS]

Re: Wild life photos- Sub divisions.

As suggested:- A sub-section titled "In their natural environment" would be interesting and I would definitely look in.