I can't see this mentioned elsewhere on this forum so apologies if someone else has already posted about it, but I thought people might be interested in this addition to the perennial discussion on what is acceptable post-processing in a photographic competition context. It is interesting that it was considered acceptable to process the background to create a particular 'mystical' feel, but not to edit details of its recognisable anatomy.
It is not stated explicitly in the article, but you will see that the ears have been swapped, presumably to aid the composition.
There is a link in the blog to the new winner and runners up, some of which I think are stunning.
It is not stated explicitly in the article, but you will see that the ears have been swapped, presumably to aid the composition.
There is a link in the blog to the new winner and runners up, some of which I think are stunning.
Comment