Have been thinking about possibly posting this question for a while, over my years on this forum I have seen quite a few comments, some quite recently, suggesting that images taken of captive birds or animals are somehow inferior to those captured in the wild.
I personally don't have a problem with images taken of captive birds or animals, the skill of getting the settings right is still the same and if the photographer didn't volunteer the information would anyone know, (unless of course a bird was shown with jesses hanging down)
Who is to say what is right or wrong, I spend literally hundreds of hours waiting for owls, kingfishers, hares etc and many times come home without getting a single shot, people who attend Wildlife Parks or reserves do at least get a better chance of not coming home empty handed.
Thoughts anyone?
Paul
Comment