Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Revisited "The ruin of the Church of Cill Chriosd in B&W"
Collapse
X
-
Revisited "The ruin of the Church of Cill Chriosd in B&W"
Peter
Feel free to browse my
Website : www.peterstockton-photography.co.uk
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/the_original_st/Tags: None
-
Re: Revisited "The ruin of the Church of Cill Chriosd in B&W"
Very nice Peter. What I would be tempted to do is to burn (darken) some of the grass on both the right and left sides to help lead the eyes to the stairs, also I might be tempted to dodge some the wall to lift it just a bit.
Tom
Comment
-
Re: Revisited "The ruin of the Church of Cill Chriosd in B&W"
As I was so helpfully advise by El Sid, halos tend to be more prominent if the image is sharpened in LR before further processing in Efexpro. I've found that it most certainly does. Did you sharpen this before processing Peter as there is an obvious halo around the tree to the left? If you didn't then I'm talking rubbish and is often the caseAlan.
7D2, 24-105 L / 70-200 F2.8 ii L / 50 F1.8 prime / Sigma 10-20 F4-F5.6
Website www.alanreeve.co.uk
Please take a look https://www.flickr.com/photos/82149274@N07/sets & https://www.facebook.com/reevephotography
Comment
-
Re: Revisited "The ruin of the Church of Cill Chriosd in B&W"
Originally posted by Parsen66 View PostAs I was so helpfully advise by El Sid, halos tend to be more prominent if the image is sharpened in LR before further processing in Efexpro. I've found that it most certainly does. Did you sharpen this before processing Peter as there is an obvious halo around the tree to the left? If you didn't then I'm talking rubbish and is often the casePeter
Feel free to browse my
Website : www.peterstockton-photography.co.uk
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/the_original_st/
Comment
-
Re: Revisited "The ruin of the Church of Cill Chriosd in B&W"
I do prefer your other B&W one of this church - I'm not too keen on the process here, sorry:- Ian
5D Mk III, 24-105 / 70-200 f2.8 L / 100-400 Mk II / 100 macro / 16-35 L / 11-24 L / 1.4 & 2x converters and a bad back carrying it all ;o)
:- https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotosespana/
Comment
Comment