Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Our 17 year old girl shot with the Sigma 85mm 1.4 Art lens

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Our 17 year old girl shot with the Sigma 85mm 1.4 Art lens

    Taken wide open at 1.4 in our conservatory.
    I'm falling in love with this lens

    Fliss by Jeff Cranwell, on Flickr
    Regards,

    Jeff

    Eos 1D x and Eos 1D mk4, EF 24-105L F4, EF 16-35L F4, EF 70-200L F2.8 mk2, EF 100L F2.8 macro, 1.4 and 2.0 mk3 converters, 600EX-RT and 430EX Speedlites.

    #2
    A lovely shot Jeff, can see why you are pleased with the 85/1:4
    Trev

    Equipment - According to the wife more than a Camera Shop got

    Flickr:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/trevb2639/

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Trev B View Post
      A lovely shot Jeff, can see why you are pleased with the 85/1:4
      Cheers Trev,

      I think the Sigma 50mm and 35mm Art lenses will be next on my wish list
      Regards,

      Jeff

      Eos 1D x and Eos 1D mk4, EF 24-105L F4, EF 16-35L F4, EF 70-200L F2.8 mk2, EF 100L F2.8 macro, 1.4 and 2.0 mk3 converters, 600EX-RT and 430EX Speedlites.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Coolcat View Post

        Cheers Trev,

        I think the Sigma 50mm and 35mm Art lenses will be next on my wish list
        A friend of mine has just got rid of his last Canon lens, he's gone over to Sigma completely
        Trev

        Equipment - According to the wife more than a Camera Shop got

        Flickr:
        https://www.flickr.com/photos/trevb2639/

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Trev B View Post

          A friend of mine has just got rid of his last Canon lens, he's gone over to Sigma completely
          Not quite ready for that......The telephoto lenses from Canon are still better than the Sigma equivalents in my opinion.
          The Sigma Art line up is pretty damn good though......A good bit cheaper than the Canon like for like glass.
          Regards,

          Jeff

          Eos 1D x and Eos 1D mk4, EF 24-105L F4, EF 16-35L F4, EF 70-200L F2.8 mk2, EF 100L F2.8 macro, 1.4 and 2.0 mk3 converters, 600EX-RT and 430EX Speedlites.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Coolcat View Post

            Not quite ready for that......The telephoto lenses from Canon are still better than the Sigma equivalents in my opinion.
            The Sigma Art line up is pretty damn good though......A good bit cheaper than the Canon like for like glass.
            He's very much into commercial product photography, so only uses the lower end ranges, not telephoto
            Trev

            Equipment - According to the wife more than a Camera Shop got

            Flickr:
            https://www.flickr.com/photos/trevb2639/

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Trev B View Post

              He's very much into commercial product photography, so only uses the lower end ranges, not telephoto
              As a commercial tog myself its one of the reasons I sold my Canon 16-35 and replaced it with the 12-24 Sigma Art, it's another ripping good lens.
              The only downside is not being able to mount filters on the front due to its bulbous glass front element.
              I don't use it for landscape photography so for me, that isn't an issue.
              I think Sigma have really landed on their feet running with their new glass........Not only good optically but the build and material quality seems top notch as well

              It is at this point I will mention........I have no affiliation with Sigma but if they do want to send me free samples..........
              Regards,

              Jeff

              Eos 1D x and Eos 1D mk4, EF 24-105L F4, EF 16-35L F4, EF 70-200L F2.8 mk2, EF 100L F2.8 macro, 1.4 and 2.0 mk3 converters, 600EX-RT and 430EX Speedlites.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Coolcat View Post

                As a commercial tog myself its one of the reasons I sold my Canon 16-35 and replaced it with the 12-24 Sigma Art, it's another ripping good lens.
                The only downside is not being able to mount filters on the front due to its bulbous glass front element.
                I don't use it for landscape photography so for me, that isn't an issue.
                I think Sigma have really landed on their feet running with their new glass........Not only good optically but the build and material quality seems top notch as well

                It is at this point I will mention........I have no affiliation with Sigma but if they do want to send me free samples..........
                Yes, couldn't agree more Jeff
                Trev

                Equipment - According to the wife more than a Camera Shop got

                Flickr:
                https://www.flickr.com/photos/trevb2639/

                Comment


                  #9
                  Very nice sharp detailed photo of a cute cat.
                  Railway Photos - Steam Train Photos

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Colin W View Post
                    Very nice sharp detailed photo of a cute cat.
                    Cheers Colin
                    Regards,

                    Jeff

                    Eos 1D x and Eos 1D mk4, EF 24-105L F4, EF 16-35L F4, EF 70-200L F2.8 mk2, EF 100L F2.8 macro, 1.4 and 2.0 mk3 converters, 600EX-RT and 430EX Speedlites.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X